Legislation Trump calls his “big, beautiful bill” is grinding its way through Congress, as the president talked up his latest anti-immigration measure
͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌      ͏ ‌     

‘Snakes are fast’ | The Guardian

Support independent journalism

}}}
This Week in Trumpland - The Guardian
Trump seeks to unite divided House Republicans around his 'big, beautiful bill'<br>WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 20: President Donald Trump, joined by Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA), speaks to the press at the U.S. Capitol following a House Republican conference meeting, in Washington, DC on May 20, 2025. (Photo by Nathan Posner/Anadolu via Getty Images)
Jul 2, 2025

‘Snakes are fast’

Legislation Trump calls his “big, beautiful bill” is grinding its way through Congress, as the president talked up his latest anti-immigration measure

Adam Gabbatt Adam Gabbatt
 

Donald Trump is obsessed with aesthetics. From hosting beauty pageants where he allegedly hustled himself into dressing rooms while contestants were naked (he denies this), to decking out his New York apartment like a dictator’s palace to wearing his tie so long that it hangs down past his crotch, the president is all about appearances.

It makes sense, then, that Trump would characterize the Senate’s passing of his self-described “big, beautiful bill” – which is predicted to add $3.3tn to the national deficit, strip millions of people of their health insurance and extend tax cuts that mostly benefit the wealthy – in pretty visual terms.

Should the House now pass the bill, the US would be, Trump announced, the “HOTTEST NATION IN THE WORLD!”

It’s not quite there yet. The bill only squeaked through in the Senate when JD Vance, the vice-president, cast a tie-breaking vote after the defection of three Republicans. Rand Paul said he voted no because the bill didn’t cut enough, the senator apparently more interested in finances than the fact that rural hospitals will be hit hard in his home state of Kentucky and elsewhere. Susan Collins and Thom Thillis voted no because they said it removes too many people from Medicaid benefits. Trump, furious, threatened to ruin Thillis’s political career – only for the North Carolina senator to announce he’s retiring anyway. Meanwhile, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, whose vote could have quashed the bill, eventually said yes after the bill was crammed with benefits for her state, including tax deductions for Alaskan whaling captains.

Representatives in the House now get their turn, with a vote on the bill expected any time now but as the Guardian’s Lauren Gambino and Chris Stein reported, the future of the legislation “hangs in the balance, as House speaker Mike Johnson seeks to quell an internal revolt over the changes made by the Senate”.

Just like in the Senate, Republicans in the House can only afford three no votes if the bill is to pass, which is not many votes. The bill is at risk, Lauren and Chris wrote, of losing decisive votes from several sides: “From rightwing fiscal hardliners demanding steep spending cuts, moderates wary of dismantling safety-net programs and Republicans from Democratic-led states expected to make a stand on a contentious tax provision.”

Trump, who spent Wednesday morning cheerily hinting that he might deport New York City’s Democratic candidate for mayor, has set a deadline of this coming Friday 4 July for Congress to pass the bill, but it seems clear this could be a long process.

Senators grafted through the night on Tuesday (sort of – CNN reported that two Republican senators took it in turns to huddle under a “large, fuzzy blanket”, while another spent the evening reading his Kindle) to pass the bill, and the House could end up doing the same.

‘A little controversial’

U.S. President Donald Trump and U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem visit a temporary migrant detention center informally known as “Alligator Alcatraz” in Ochopee, Florida, U.S.

Not Trump, though. He spent Tuesday on a little trip to Florida, to visit “Alligator Alcatraz”.

The new migrant detention jail – “a tented camp on mosquito-infested land 50 miles west of Miami”, as my colleague Richard Luscombe wrote – has been criticized for subjecting its future inmates to cruel and demeaning treatment, as well as busting up the fragile environment of the Florida wetlands.

Trump disagrees.

“It might be as good as the real Alcatraz,” Trump cooed after touring the facility. “A little controversial, but I couldn’t care less.”

Praise indeed from a man who is attempting to reopen the original Alcatraz, the California island prison that Clint Eastwood famously escaped in 1979.

Trump had earlier offered some ghoulish, oddly specific advice to people who may attempt to escape his tent prison, which is located in a reptile-heavy area.

Asked by a reporter if “the idea” is that if someone escapes from the tents, “they get eaten by an alligator or a snake”, the president of the United States replied:

“I guess that’s the concept. This is not a nice business. I guess that’s the concept. If you… you know… the snakes are fast.

“But alligators… We’re going to teach them how to run away from an alligator. Don’t run in a straight line, look, like this [at this point Trump made a zigzag motion with his hands], and you know what? Your chances go up about 1%. Not a good thing.”

Trump’s remarks were quickly shared on social media by the White House, along with videos of the president touring the literal cages where up to 5,000 people could eventually be detained.

So things are a bit grim all round, really. Perhaps it’s time to run for the hills, in a manner in which our chances go up. Not in a straight line, you understand, but like this, in a zigzag motion. Maybe that’ll do it.

 
The Guardian Investigates: Missing in the Amazon

What terrible truth were they trying to expose?

Our new six-part investigative podcast series uncovers what happened to a journalist and an indigenous defender after disappearing in the Amazon.

New episodes every Monday.

 
 

Betsy Reed

Editor, Guardian US

Person Image

I hope you appreciated this newsletter. Before you move on, I wanted to ask whether you could support the Guardian’s journalism as we face the unprecedented challenges of covering the second Trump administration.

As Trump himself observed: “The first term, everybody was fighting me. In this term, everybody wants to be my friend.”

He’s not entirely wrong. All around us, media organizations have begun to capitulate. First, two news outlets pulled election endorsements at the behest of their billionaire owners. Next, prominent reporters bent the knee at Mar-a-Lago. And then a major network – ABC News – rolled over in response to Trump’s legal challenges and agreed to a $16m million settlement in his favor.

The Guardian is clear: we have no interest in being Donald Trump’s – or any politician’s – friend. Our allegiance as independent journalists is not to those in power but to the public.

How are we able to stand firm in the face of intimidation and threats? As journalists say: follow the money. The Guardian has neither a self-interested billionaire owner nor profit-seeking corporate henchmen pressuring us to appease the rich and powerful. We are funded by our readers and owned by the Scott Trust – whose only financial obligation is to preserve our journalistic mission in perpetuity.

With the new administration boasting about its desire to punish journalists, and Trump and his allies already pursuing lawsuits against newspapers whose stories they don’t like, it has never been more urgent, or more perilous, to pursue fair, accurate reporting. Can you support the Guardian today?

We value whatever you can spare, but a recurring contribution makes the most impact, enabling greater investment in our most crucial, fearless journalism. As our thanks to you, we can offer you some great benefits. We’ve made it very quick to set up, so we hope you’ll consider it.

However you choose to support us: thank you for helping protect the free press. Whatever happens in the coming months and years, you can rely on the Guardian never to bow down to power, nor back down from truth.

 
}}}
Get in touch
If you have any questions or comments about any of our newsletters please email newsletters@theguardian.com
https://www.theguardian.com/uk

You are receiving this email because you are a subscriber to This Week in Trumpland. Guardian News & Media Limited - a member of Guardian Media Group PLC. Registered Office: Kings Place, 90 York Way, London, N1 9GU. Registered in England No. 908396