RFK Jr.’s War on mRNA Vaccines. Plus. . . The organ donation dilemma dividing doctors. Why Democrats are missing the point on gerrymandering. Joe Nocera celebrates 10 years of ‘Hamilton.’ And much more.
(Illustration by The Free Press; images via Getty)
It’s Thursday, August 21. This is The Front Page, your daily window into the world of The Free Press—and our take on the world at large. Today: The new definition of death one medical ethicist says could open the door to organ harvesting. The Israeli dance professor suing Berkeley for discrimination. Why the Broadway smash hit ‘Hamilton’ couldn’t get made in 2025. But first: The miracle molecule caught in RFK Jr.’s crosshairs. Our deliverance arrived during the bleakest days of the Covid-19 pandemic: a vaccine developed with a breakthrough technology that would crush the virus and allow normal life to resume. And that wasn’t all. The vaccine delivery system, known as mRNA, had the potential, we were told, to bring us one miracle cure after another. Infectious diseases would be quickly vanquished. Effective, individualized cancer treatments would be standard fare. All due to the work of scientists—two of whom won the Nobel Prize—who figured out how to harness a molecule essential for life. Now mRNA is back in the news, and the news is not so good. Recently, Health and Human Services secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced that the federal government was canceling nearly $500 million in government-funded mRNA research projects. Kennedy has long been an mRNA foe, calling the Covid shot “the deadliest vaccine ever made” back in 2001. Bethany McLean, who with our own Joe Nocera wrote the book The Big Fail: What the Pandemic Revealed About Who America Protects and Who It Leaves Behind, investigates the little molecule that was supposed to change everything. McLean talked to scientists, investors, and policymakers—and sorted through the hype, politics, and demonization to tell us where mRNA technology actually stands. One conclusion she draws that most of us likely can agree with is that we now live in a world in which “politics and science corrupt each other.” —Emily Yoffe |