On Politics: Charlie Kirk and America’s grim routine
While we have endured violent eras before, this is one with instant footage, and instant reaction.
On Politics
September 10, 2025

Trump’s Washington

How President Trump is changing government, the country and its politics.

Good evening. Tonight, we’re covering the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk, the right-wing youth activist and close Trump ally, at an event on a college campus in Utah, which is the latest example of violence against a political figure in America.

Charlie Kirk stands in profile looking to the left of the frame holding a microphone with his left hand. He is wearing a blue suit and red tie and is speaking at a clear lectern.
Charlie Kirk speaking at a Turning Point Action conference in Detroit in 2024. He was a staunch ally of President Trump. Nic Antaya for The New York Times

America’s grim routine

The people filming with their phones at Charlie Kirk’s “Prove Me Wrong” event on Wednesday afternoon at Utah Valley University were probably hoping to capture the kind of provocative viral moment that the right-wing youth activist is known for.

Instead, they filmed a shocking act of political violence — the kind of thing, once again, that America is known for.

Kirk, a close ally of President Trump who founded the country’s pre-eminent right-wing youth activist organization, was shot in the neck on Wednesday afternoon, about 20 minutes into his debate. President Trump announced Kirk’s death — at the age of 31 — on social media, and Speaker Mike Johnson held a moment of silence on the House floor.

“Political violence has become all too common in American society, and this is not who we are,” Johnson said on Wednesday.

But it is.

It was only a few months ago that a Democratic Minnesota lawmaker and her husband were assassinated by a man who said his actions were motivated by his views about Covid-19 vaccine mandates.

Before that, a man set fire to the Pennsylvania governor’s residence while Gov. Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, and his family members slept inside. Two employees at the Israeli Embassy in Washington were shot and killed. The Republican Party headquarters in New Mexico and a Tesla dealership in the state were firebombed. And that was just in recent months.

Former Representative Gabby Giffords, a Democrat, was shot in the head in 2011. Republican lawmakers were shot while practicing baseball in 2017. The husband of the Democratic Representative Nancy Pelosi was attacked at home the following year. President Trump was shot in the ear while campaigning last year in Butler, Pa., before another attempt on his life just months later.

“I like to not think about it,” Trump said earlier this summer about the assassination attempts. “You know, it affects some people greatly. I can’t afford to be affected because I have a job to do.”

The suspect’s motivation was not immediately known. Still, Kirk’s death has become the latest episode of violence against a political figure in a nation where that has become a grim routine. And while there have been violent periods in America before, this is a new era of instant footage, and instant reaction.

“I don’t know where we go from here as a news program,” the Fox News anchor Will Cain told viewers, as he announced Kirk’s death, “and I don’t know where we go from here in America.”

Kirk had spent much of his day talking about another violent death caught on camera, largely in the context of his political beliefs. Earlier in the day, he had posted to his social media account stills and snippets of a graphic video showing the stabbing of a Ukrainian woman on a train in Charlotte, N.C., and told his followers to consider her killing a political matter.

“It’s 100% necessary to politicize the senseless murder of Iryna Zarutska,” he wrote, referring to the victim of the crime, “because it was politics that allowed a savage monster with 14 priors to be free on the streets to kill her.”

By the end of the day, he had become a victim himself, and it was his death that the political world was reacting to. In the immediate aftermath of Kirk’s shooting, the response seemed to cleave along political lines. Democrats like Shapiro and Giffords condemned the violence, as did many Republicans.

But other voices on the right did what Kirk had suggested people do about the Charlotte murder: They politicized it. Before the authorities had charged anyone, or revealed any motivation, some on the right placed blame on Democrats, or even called for war and vengeance.

That has worried experts in political violence, who warned that, whatever the motivation behind Kirk’s death, it could potentially kick off fresh violence in response, depending on how it is framed by political leaders.

Elon Musk, the erstwhile Trump ally, called the left the “party of murder” in a post on his social media website, X. And Representative Anna Paulina Luna, Republican of Florida, seemed to blame the “rotten House and the corrupt media” for the attack.

“Every damn one of you who called us fascists did this,” she wrote on X in all capital letters.

Enrique Tarrio, the former leader of the Proud Boys, reposted to his X account a post from a fellow Jan. 6 defendant calling for “war.”

Those reactions alarmed Lilliana Hall Mason, of Johns Hopkins University. Mason has found that about 20 percent of Americans believe that political violence is at least sometimes justified — but said that number rises to 60 percent if people from the other political party committed an act of violence first.

“It really does depend on how leadership frames it for their supporters,” Mason said. “To the extent that leaders are framing this as something that needs to be retaliated against, I think that creates a huge opportunity for really bad things to happen.”

She added, “If the cycle of retaliatory violence gets started, it’s really hard to stop it.”

Dr. Garen Wintemute, a professor of emergency medicine and a public health researcher at the University of California, Davis, urged caution. “It is not inevitable today, as it was not inevitable the day after Donald Trump got shot last fall, that we are going to become a more violent nation, that we are going to use violence to solve our political differences.” He added, “The task that all of us face is to keep the extremists from pulling us over the cliff with them.”

Got a tip?
The Times offers several ways to send important information confidentially.

Where and when Kirk was fatally shot

Aerial image by Google | By Lazaro Gamio and Daniel Wood

While much is unknown about the shooting, a group of my colleagues is tracking all of the details we have learned so far.

According to Utah Valley University officials, Kirk was shot at about 12:10 p.m. local time, about 20 minutes after he began speaking on campus, about 40 miles south of Salt Lake City.

The event was the first of a 15-stop itinerary on what was called the American Comeback Tour, which had planned appearances at college campuses across the country. Kirk was sitting beneath a white tent emblazoned with “American Comeback,” in an outdoor amphitheater space on campus.

Seconds before he was shot, he was asked a question about mass shootings in America.

Read more here.

A large crowd looks on as Donald Trump speaks on a stage. A sign above him says Chase the Vote.
A Turning Point event in Phoenix last year. The conservative group organizes college students. Ash Ponders for The New York Times

What is Turning Point USA?

Kirk was best known for his role founding Turning Point USA. My colleague Emma Goldberg explained what the group is.

Turning Point USA, which was founded by Charlie Kirk when he was 18, is a conservative political organization with chapters spanning across over 850 colleges. The group’s ethos, according to its official website, is to “identify, educate, train and organize students to promote the principles of fiscal responsibility, free markets and limited government.”

The organization often sends conservative speakers, including Kirk himself, to college campuses, and hosts conferences that attract thousands of young people to engage in right-wing political discussions on issues like economics, race and immigration. In June, Turning Point organized the largest young conservative women’s event in the country, where speakers encouraged 3,000 attendees to put marriage before their professions.

Turning Point, which also registers students to vote, credits itself with getting swaths of young people to the polls for Trump in the 2024 election. Donald Trump Jr. previously called Kirk “one of the true rock stars of this movement.”

The group also hosts popular podcasts like the politics-focused “Charlie Kirk Show.”

Read more here.

MORE POLITICS NEWS AND ANALYSIS

An aerial view of the Pentagon.

Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times

House Passes Defense Policy Bill With Transgender, Diversity Restrictions

For the third year in a row, House Republicans pushed through a Pentagon policy measure that included conservative policy dictates.

By Robert Jimison

Article Image

Doug Mills/The New York Times

Protesters Call Out Trump as He Dines Out in Washington

Mr. Trump made the short trek from the White House to Joe’s Seafood, Prime Steak & Stone Crab to show that his federal crackdown on crime in the nation’s capital was working.

By Tyler Pager

President Trump at a podium.

Tierney L. Cross/The New York Times

Trump Threatens to Sue The Times Over Reporting on Epstein Drawing

The president has denied that he created and signed a sexually suggestive note that was included in a 2003 birthday gift for Jeffrey Epstein.

By Michael M. Grynbaum

Article Image

Doug Mills/The New York Times

Vaccines and C.D.C. Chaos Expose Tensions Between Trump and Kennedy

While there is no evidence of a break between them, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has caused consternation among President Trump and some of his aides.

By Sheryl Gay Stolberg and Maggie Haberman

Read past editions of the newsletter here.

If you’re enjoying what you’re reading, please consider recommending it to others. They can sign up here.

Have feedback? Ideas for coverage? We’d love to hear from you. Email us at onpolitics@nytimes.com.

A square filled with smaller squares and rectangles in shades of red and blue.

If you received this newsletter from someone else, subscribe here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for On Politics from The New York Times.

To stop receiving On Politics, unsubscribe. To opt out of other promotional emails from The Times, including those regarding The Athletic, manage your email settings.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on: