Edited by Kim Klemballa

Was this newsletter forwarded to you? Sign up here. 

Hi readers,

In today’s newsletter, Philipp Zentner, CEO and co-founder of LI.FI, makes the case for how Stablecoins are quietly rewriting the rules of global finance and why even amidst this wave of launches we’re seeing, we need more.

Then, Adam Guren, founder and CIO of Hunting Hill Global Capital, states that the next phase of digital asset investing belongs to those who treat this space not as a thematic allocation, but as a dynamic alpha-centric market where strategy, speed, and sophistication are decisive.

Webinar alert! Get informed on current crypto market dynamics, client sentiment and viewing the asset class beyond bitcoin. Join Fundstrat Capital, Grayscale and CoinDesk Indices on September 25 at 11:00am ET. Register today.

Thanks for joining us.

– Kim Klembella

From the Analyst

Why We Need More Stablecoins

Stablecoins are the real success story in crypto. In the past six years, Stablecoins have quietly become indispensable. Since 2019, people have used stablecoins to move $264.5 trillion across 18 billion in transactions. Why? Stablecoins let you hold money onchain without having to worry about volatility, making them the easiest way to store value and transact in the crypto economy.

Why are Stablecoins popular right now?

We’re seeing a rush of companies launching stablecoins in the U.S. because issuers finally gained clarity with the passing of the GENIUS Act in July 2025. For the first time, the U.S. government clearly defined who can issue stablecoins, what counts as a “payment stablecoin,” and what obligations issuers have to consumers.

Since the GENIUS Act passed, MetaMask rolled out mUSD, Stripe launched a payments-focused chain called Tempo, Circle announced their purpose-built stablecoin payments L1, Arc Network, and there’s been a spree of acquisitions. Stablecoin infrastructure companies like Iron are getting snapped up, and traditional finance firms like Stripe are spending heavily to buy crypto companies (Privy and Bridge) whose products they can fold into their existing offerings.

In addition, chains are launching their own stablecoins as a way to capture more revenue from the yield they generate. MegaETH has its native stablecoin, USDm. Hyperliquid launched USDH, which sparked a bidding war with Paxos, Agora, Sky, and Frax all vying to get involved.

At this rate, it’s easy to imagine a world where every serious company in crypto eventually issues its own stablecoin. Which raises the obvious question: do we need more?

Why we need more Stablecoins:

1. Financial inclusion: Even as the number of unbanked people falls, over 1.3 billion remain without access to banking, mostly in places with unstable currencies. Stablecoins provide 24/7 access to money online, without borders. If companies like PayPal push stablecoins directly to existing customers, they could onboard more people to use the global money rails of crypto.
   
   
2. Currency diversity: In the real world, we don’t have one currency. We have dollars, euros, yen. The same should be true onchain. If everything settles in dollars, the entire crypto economy becomes dependent on U.S. monetary policy. More stablecoins means less over-reliance on a single standard.
   
   
3. Risk mitigation: Right now stablecoin markets are concentrated into the hands of a few big players. With more stablecoins, concentration risk decreases. If one issuer faces technical, regulatory, or solvency issues, users would have alternatives to pivot to without destabilizing the broader ecosystem. More issuers mean more redundancy, making the system safer.

Institutional Outlook

Now is the Time for Active Management in Digital Assets

The digital asset market has entered a new phase, one that is more diverse and institutionally engaged than ever before. We are in an era where execution matters more than exposure; where performance hinges not on passive participation, but on how capital is deployed, risk is managed, and alpha is extracted across an increasingly fragmented and complex market.

Innovation is moving faster than index construction. Structural inefficiencies, cross-market dislocations, and credit dynamics are accelerating even as macro conditions remain stable. Recent ETF flows illustrate this shift: in mid-August, U.S. spot ETFs recorded more than $1 billion in a single day of net inflows, led by $640 million into BlackRock’s ETHA and $277 million into Fidelity’s FETH, pushing total ETH ETF assets above $25 billion.

U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs show similarly active capital rotation, with daily flows swinging between inflows, $614 million on August 8, 2025, and sharp outflows in the days following. Meanwhile, derivatives growth has become a defining feature of market structure with open interest on CME Bitcoin futures hitting a record ~$57 billion, highlighting deeper institutional participation. Crypto derivatives now account for approximately 70-80% of global trading volumes.  These movements, alongside the growth of on-chain credit, the derivatives complex and the rise of BTC/ETH-denominated funds, underscore that this is a market defined by tactical allocation and active positioning.

Today’s opportunities demand depth, precision, and a multi-dimensional understanding of both the traditional and digital asset market. The most compelling opportunities are uncovered by managers who can operate seamlessly across centralized and decentralized exchanges, in spot, derivatives, and credit. These are not directional trades riding sentiment; they are high-conviction strategies grounded in an expert understanding of the evolving market structure of digital assets, executed with rigor and speed across fragmented venues. 

Structural tailwinds are reinforcing the setup for active capital

Recent economic data suggests that risk assets are reaching new highs even in the absence of monetary easing, yet the real story isn’t cyclical, it’s structural.

Crypto credit markets are expanding, with widening spreads between lending and borrowing rates. As BTC and ETH credit markets mature, dispersion in credit quality and spreads is increasing. This creates a differentiated opportunity set where active managers can price risk more effectively than passive exposure, rewarding those with the tools and expertise to capture value. As fiat liquidity tightens and token-native borrowing regains traction, the setup for basis trades, structured strategies, and cross-venue capital deployment strengthens.

Meanwhile, idiosyncratic volatility is re-emerging around protocol upgrades, ETF flows, and regulatory catalysts, favoring familiar hedge fund strategies, including relative value, and volatility arbitrage. These dynamics reward managers who can price complexity, structure trades thoughtfully, and execute with discipline.

Institutional allocators are moving with greater precision

Institutional allocators in 2025 are demonstrating a new level of clarity. Many already hold baseline exposure to capture crypto market beta through ETFs or spot. While these passive products helped legitimize digital assets and broaden access, it is active managers who are generating performance in today’s market. They are building systems designed to deliver value across market regimes, extracting alpha that is uncorrelated to broader digital asset price trends.

Many of the most effective strategies are not new; they have been tested and refined across multiple cycles, drawing on insights from both traditional finance and digital markets. What has changed is the infrastructure, sophistication of the investors, and the breadth of the opportunity set.

The next phase of digital asset investing belongs to those who treat this space not as a thematic allocation, but as a dynamic alpha-centric market where strategy, speed, and sophistication are decisive.

Keep Reading