Plus today's top stories ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Have you ever wondered how this newsletter comes into being? It lands in your inbox every day as a neat package: a short editorial followed by a dozen or so articles written by academics on everything from health and science to politics to the environment or arts. For you it is a fait accompli. For me, it’s a smouldering battlefield: all I can see are the traces of skirmishes and debates, compromises, mistakes, and missed opportunities.

Perhaps I should begin at the beginning. Each day at The Conversation starts with an editorial conference. We discuss the news of the day and think about how academics can shed light on it. The US Supreme Court is going to make a decision on the legality of US President Donald Trump’s tariffs. Do we have a legal expert who can explain the issues at stake? Would it be better to find a business expert to talk about the global economic impacts? Or perhaps someone to write about geopolitics? Maybe all three? Or something else?

Once the initial story list is drawn up, editors start contacting academics. Sometimes we interview academics on the phone and post the article within a few hours. Some articles are filed the same day. Others, like our Walkley-shortlisted multimedia explainer on how to spot a rip.

Once the draft arrives the real work starts, by which I mean the arguing. Does the headline accurately reflect the key thrust of the article? Does it grab your attention? How do we know this claim is true? Could it be better expressed? Is the author happy with the headline and the picture? Is there another way to do this?

In this way we crawl, crablike, toward a refined final product, one that we hope is improved by the rigours of editing. But some of what we do is mere guesswork, because a key ingredient is missing: you.

We produce all our articles for you, our reader. Every editorial decision is made in your name, but most of the time you aren’t in the room with us to tell us what you want. That’s why we have created our Your Say section, and it’s been a delight in recent months to see a range of insightful comments from readers.

The other important way we invite you into the room is via our annual reader survey. It takes only 5-10 minutes to complete, and it provides invaluable guidance about what matters the most to you. Please help us by taking a few minutes today to fill out the survey: your feedback matters, and you might even help to settle some arguments.

Misha Ketchell

Editor-in-chief

 

How damaging to the royal family is the scandal surrounding Prince Andrew?

Dennis Altman, La Trobe University

The British royals are no strangers to scandals – and they are likely to be able to manage this one.

What will happen to the Louvre jewellery after the heist? There are two likely scenarios

Andreas Schloenhardt, The University of Queensland

The stolen jewellery includes well-known pieces that are easily recognisable, which will make it difficult to sell on the black market.

View from The Hill: Liberals are now squabbling among themselves over Kevin Rudd

Michelle Grattan, University of Canberra

Whether the US ambassador should resign is the latest point of dispute – not to mention a total overreaction.

Most Australians agree there’s a housing crisis. But they differ on what’s causing it – and how to fix it

Ben Spies-Butcher, Macquarie University; Adam Stebbing, Macquarie University; Alistair Sisson, Macquarie University; Kristian Ruming, Macquarie University; Shaun Wilson, Macquarie University

New research shows older voters believe immigration is crunching housing supply, while young voters blame high interest rates and low wage growth.

There is little evidence AI chatbots are ‘bullying kids’ – but this doesn’t mean these tools are safe

Luke Heemsbergen, Deakin University

The internet long ago extended cruelty beyond the school gate and into bedrooms and group chats. The powers of AI extend this reach.

In her revenue era: the economics behind Taylor Swift’s 34 versions of The Life of a Showgirl

Paul Crosby, Macquarie University

The album was released in dozens of different formats. Other artists have done this before, but rarely at this scale or with such an intense response from fans.

The ABC’s Top 100 books poll lacks diversity. Here are my 10 First Nations ‘books of the 21st century’

Melanie Saward, The University of Queensland

Just three Aboriginal writers appeared in Radio National’s poll. There was little sense of the breadth and creativity of our First Nations writing scene.

More whales are getting tangled in fishing gear and shark nets. Here’s what we can do

Olaf Meynecke, Griffith University

Australian scientists have noticed a rise in the number of whales getting stuck in ropes and fishing lines. Rescuing them is a job for experts.

Politics + Society

Health + Medicine

Environment + Energy

Science + Technology

Arts + Culture

Books + Ideas

Great big holes
"Americans like to say they have the world's best democratic system with all the safeguards, the 'perfect' declaration of independence, constitution, etc. The last 10 months have unequivocally highlighted how fragile it all is; how easy it is to shoot great big holes through it all. And that starts at the political shambles known as the US Supreme Court."
Alan Lander

A much-needed shakeup
"For decades, universities didn't see themselves as institutions that were in need of reform. Multiple incidents have shown this is not the case. Having obtained qualifications from three major Australian universities over three decades, I have seen firsthand the negative changes. The university experience in 2025 is a far cry from that of the 1980s."
Charles Latimer 

Where to for the Libs
"I’m not a Liberal voter but Tony Abbott makes good points as to the way for the Liberals to move forward. The Liberals are at their lowest ebb and will become irrelevant unless they can invigorate themselves with bold new policy initiatives."
Tom Filipcevic

We'd love to hear from you. You can email us with your thoughts on our stories and each day we'll publish an edited selection.

 

Featured jobs

View all