+ Another major law firm merger.

Get full access to Reuters.com for just $1/week. Subscribe now.

 

The Afternoon Docket

The Afternoon Docket

A newsletter by Reuters and Westlaw

 

By Sara Merken

What's going on today?

  • The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a defense by President Trump's administration of the government's authority to limit the processing of asylum claims at ports of entry along the U.S.-Mexico border.
  • A California state judge ruled that 6,000 Black workers at Tesla's flagship assembly plant cannot sue over alleged racial harassment as a class, reversing an earlier ruling in a major victory for CEO Elon Musk's electric vehicle maker.
  • The American Bar Association will undertake a sweeping review of its standards for law schools as states weigh dropping the organization as an accreditor and critics blame its regulations for driving up student costs. The organization may also eliminate its diversity and inclusion requirement for law schools.
 

Judge finds 'profound' missteps in US probe of FBI ex-chief James Comey

 

REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/Files

A U.S. judge found there is evidence of misconduct in how a federal prosecutor closely aligned with President Trump secured criminal charges against James Comey, and ordered that grand jury materials be turned over to the former FBI chief's defense lawyers.

Alexandria, Virginia-based U.S. Magistrate Judge William Fitzgerald found that Lindsey Halligan, the Trump-appointed U.S. attorney leading the case, may have made significant legal errors in presenting evidence and instructing grand jurors who were weighing whether to charge Comey – mistakes that could have tainted the case.

"The record points to a disturbing pattern of profound investigative missteps, missteps that led an FBI agent and a prosecutor to potentially undermine the integrity of the grand jury proceeding," Fitzgerald wrote in his ruling. A DOJ spokesperson declined to comment on the decision.

Comey is one of three prominent critics of the president to have been hit with criminal charges by Trump's DOJ in recent months. Trump critics have described the charges as a part of a campaign by the president to chill opposition. Comey pleaded not guilty after being charged in September with making false statements and obstructing a congressional investigation. Read more from Andrew Goudsward.

 

More top news

  • Supreme Court to review US government power to limit asylum processing
  • Law firm Motley Rice denies breaching Alaska contract, seeks fees for opioids case
  • DC appellate firm picks up departing DOJ Supreme Court advocate
  • Dutch court upholds asylum denial for US transgender woman
  • US House to push forward on Epstein vote after Trump reversal
  • ABA to review law school standards, may drop diversity rule amid pressure
  • US appeals court to weigh reviving cases over Tylenol and autism
  • Tesla wins bid to undo race bias class action by Black factory workers
  • Lil Nas X returns to court on police assault charges
 
 

Law firms Ashurst, Perkins Coie agree to merger to create global top-20 outfit

 

REUTERS/Andrew Kelly

London-headquartered law firm Ashurst and U.S.-based Perkins Coie agreed to a merger that would create a combined firm of 3,000 lawyers with $2.7 billion in revenue, putting it in the top 20 worldwide.

The announcement marks the latest major transatlantic merger of law firms in recent years, part of a move toward consolidation as firms seek scale to compete across major markets and practice areas. It follows similar agreements between British and U.S. firms, including a deal between Herbert Smith Freehills and Kramer Levin and another between Allen & Overy and Shearman & Sterling.

Ashurst global CEO Paul Jenkins and Perkins Coie managing partner Bill Malley will be global co-CEOs of the new firm, which will be called Ashurst Perkins Coie. The firms said the proposed merger is subject to approval by a vote of partners at each firm and, if approved, is expected to be completed in late 2026. Read more about the deal.

 

Does it pay to incentivize class action plaintiffs? A new study says no

New research crunching more than seven years of data from class actions has an unexpected takeaway: People are willing to serve as the public face of a lawsuit on behalf of others, even if they don’t get paid anything extra. The findings by Vanderbilt Law School professor Brian Fitzpatrick fly in the face of long held assumptions that payments are necessary to incentivize people to be class representatives. Jenna Greene has more in On the Case.

 

In other news ...

Bangladesh's ousted prime minister, Sheikh Hasina, was sentenced to death in her absence at the end of a months-long trial that found her guilty of ordering a deadly crackdown on a student-led uprising last year … U.S. colleges saw a 17% drop in newly enrolled international students this fall, according to a new report … Federal agents arrested at least 81 people in Charlotte, North Carolina this past weekend … Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney faces a crucial test when Parliament votes on his first budget. Plus, a Reuters exclusive: Boaz Weinstein's Saba Capital Management has sold credit derivatives in recent months to lenders seeking protection on big tech names like Oracle and Microsoft due to concerns over a debt-financed AI investment frenzy, a source said.