Today the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Alabama’s effort to reinstate the death sentence of a man deemed intellectually disabled.
Why it matters: The case could clarify how courts assess intellectual disabilities, particularly the use of multiple IQ scores and related evidence. The ruling, expected by the end of June, could impact death penalty standards nationwide.
Context: Joseph Clifton Smith was convicted of a 1997 murder and sentenced to death. A federal judge and the 11th Circuit found him intellectually disabled under the Supreme Court’s 2002 Atkins v. Virginia precedent, which bars executing such individuals. Alabama argues lower courts applied the wrong legal standard.
The lawyers: Alabama Principal Deputy Solicitor General Robert Overing for the state; DOJ attorney Harry Graver for the U.S. as amicus curiae; and WilmerHale’s Seth Waxman for Smith.