first opinion
A designer weighs in on the new food pyramid

Adobe
If you’ve read any of our coverage on the new dietary guidelines, you know that the Trump administration didn’t just change policy. It also decided to return to a (now inverted) food pyramid visual. “The resulting graphic feels less like a contemporary public-health tool and more like a collection of emoji-inspired illustrations or clip art from a 1950s health pamphlet,” prominent designer Debbie Millman argues in a new First Opinion essay.
But it’s not just outdated, it’s confusing, she adds. Protein, dairy, and fats are prioritized at the wide top of the pyramid, but the visual logic provides few clues about quantity, balance, or what any actual meal should look like. Read more on why Millman believes that the design for the new food pyramid falls short — and why it matters. (Also, interestingly, how the retro aesthetic reflects the administration’s focus on nostalgia and populism.)
Afterwards, read another new essay from a dietician, who writes that the new guidelines will only make her job harder.
one big number
1 in 4
That’s how many adults with dementia over age 65 were prescribed brain-altering medications like antipsychotics, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, and others that come with an increased risk of delirium, falls, and hospitalization. The data comes from a study published yesterday in JAMA, which analyzed Medicare claims between 2013 and 2021. While claims for these “potentially inappropriate” medications decreased overall, older adults with cognitive impairments were more likely than those with normal cognition to be given a prescription.