+ SCOTUS could reshape a constitutional guarantee.

Get full access to Reuters.com for just $1/week. Subscribe now.

 

The Daily Docket

The Daily Docket

A newsletter by Reuters and Westlaw

 

By Caitlin Tremblay

Good morning. Today the U.S. Supreme Court will weigh President Trump’s bid to limit birthright citizenship. Plus, the 5th Circuit will consider the constitutionality of the Federal Switchblade Act; a federal judge in D.C. will consider blocking Trump’s sanctions against the International Criminal Court; and a David Boies-led legal team asked for $147 million in fees from a Google verdict. Here’s a look at cherry blossoms in bloom around the world. I hope they put a little spring in your step today.

 

U.S. Supreme Court hears Trump's bid to limit birthright citizenship

 

REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments over the legality of President Trump’s executive order restricting birthright citizenship, a contentious part of his efforts to curb immigration.

Why it matters: The case could alter how the 14th Amendment has long been understood. On March 28, 1898, the court ruled that the 14th Amendment grants citizenship by birth on U.S. soil. Read the 1898 decision here. If the court decides (again) that the Constitution protects birthright citizenship, then only a constitutional amendment could change that. That process would likely take years. More here.

Context: This is technically the second time the Supreme Court has considered the Trump birthright case. Last June the court handed Trump a major victory in the case by curbing the ability of judges to impede his policies nationwide, changing the power balance between the federal judiciary and presidents. But that ruling did not address the legality of the policy which is what the justices will take up today. More here.

Who: Solicitor General D. John Sauer for the petitioners; ACLU National Legal Director Cecillia Wang for the respondents. 

 

Be my favorite reader? Tell me what you think of the newsletter in this quick survey.

 

Coming up today

  • Constitutional law: The 5th Circuit will hear arguments in a lawsuit by the group Knife Rights challenging the constitutionality of the Federal Switchblade Act, a 1958 federal law prohibiting the manufacture and distribution of switchblade knives. Read the lower court decision.
  • Government: U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in D.C. will hold a preliminary injunction hearing in a lawsuit challenging a Trump executive order that imposed sanctions against the International Criminal Court. Read the complaint. 
  • Voting rights: The Maine Supreme Court will take up the question of whether Maine can use ranked-choice voting in state-level general elections.
  • Criminal: Luigi Mangione, the man accused of gunning down a health insurance executive in Manhattan, is due in federal court as his lawyers seek to delay his upcoming trial on stalking charges.
  • Criminal: An initial conference is scheduled in Manhattan federal court in the U.S. criminal smuggling case against Super MicroComputer co-founder Yih-Shyan Liaw and former Super Micro contractor Ting-Wei Sun. A third defendant is at large.

Court calendars are subject to last-minute docket changes.

 

More top news

  • Trump will personally go to Supreme Court for birthright citizenship case
  • U.S. customs agency says tariff refund system progressing, but payments may take up to 45 days
  • U.S. judge rejects IRS pact allowing churches to endorse political candidates
  • Trump administration pauses plans to buy warehouses for immigrant detention, sources say
  • Judicial panel in Wisconsin dismisses lawsuit challenging state's congressional map
  • Trump administration prepares final lending rule to narrow civil rights protections
 
 

$147 million

That’s how much a David Boies-led legal team asked for in fees after winning a $425 million jury verdict against Google in a data privacy trial last year. Boies Schiller Flexner; Susman Godfrey and Morgan & Morgan said awarding the full amount would encourage plaintiffs’ lawyers to take difficult cases to trial rather than accept settlements that could shortchange class members. Read more.

 

"Colorado may regard its policy as essential to public health and safety. Certainly, censorious governments throughout history have believed the same. But the First Amendment stands as a shield against any effort to enforce orthodoxy in thought or speech in this country."

—U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, writing for the majority, ruling against Colorado’s ban on LGBTQ+ “conversion therapy.” The court ruled 8-1 backing the challenge to the law and returned the case to the lower court for further proceedings under a more rigorous First Amendment standard. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented. Read the opinion.

 

In the courts

  • Government: U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in D.C. blocked President Trump from proceeding with construction of a $400 million ballroom on the site of the White House's demolished East Wing.