In the past two emails I covered technical risk and market risk, the two places I see hardware products fail most often.
Today's the third: financial risk. Even with a solid design and proven demand, you can still get hurt by how you pay for production.
I placed a 10,000-unit production order before I had the customer orders to justify it. All my capital got tied up in inventory sitting in a warehouse.
The lower-risk path is to let demand fund production. Pre-sales and crowdfunding work well for this.
If you've done the validation work I described in my last email, you've already built the proof of demand you need.
So instead of funding everything out of your own pocket, your customers are funding it. That one change takes a huge amount of risk off the table.
Beyond that, you can negotiate terms with your manufacturer that keep your upfront costs down. Amortizing tooling is one of the most common approaches.
Instead of paying $30,000 upfront for injection molds, you negotiate a slightly higher per-unit cost and the manufacturer spreads that tooling expense across your first several production runs. You still pay for the molds, just not all at once.
Payment terms matter too. Net 60 or Net 90 terms mean you don't pay for production until well after units ship, which gives you time to collect revenue before the bill comes due.
My manufacturer gave me 90-day terms after I showed traction with pre-sales. That meant I wasn't fronting the full cost of production myself.
You can also look for a manufacturer who's willing to invest in your product directly, especially if you can show real pre-sales data. Some manufacturers will co-invest in tooling or offer extended terms if they believe in the product's potential.
My manufacturer ended up investing over $100,000 in my project. It doesn't always work out that way, but it's always worth the conversation.
The bottom line is you have more options than you think for funding production without putting everything on the line yourself.
I call this the Predictable Launch Protocol. At every stage, you reduce risk by getting outside expert input and proper validation instead of rushing ahead alone.
Whether you're reviewing a design, validating an idea, or funding a production run, the approach doesn't change.
Most help out there only covers one of these three. The engineering side doesn't understand the market and financial risk. And the business coaches don't understand the design and manufacturing risk.
But for a hardware product, you can't really separate the technical side from the market side from the financial side. They're all connected.
I built the Hardware Academy around this idea because I've lived all three sides.
I spent over a decade as a design engineer at Texas Instruments, then launched my own product and learned the market and financial lessons the hard way.
That's why the Academy gives you a team of experienced engineers and product experts to help reduce all three risks.
Whether you're validating your idea, getting your design reviewed, or figuring out how to fund production, you won't have to risk everything.
Cheers,
John Teel
Founder / Engineer
Predictable Designs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
