%title%
The Briefing
Remember back to last December, when President Donald Trump issued an executive order designed to “remove barriers to United States AI leadership”?͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­͏ ‌     ­
Jun 25, 2026

The Briefing

Martin Peers headshot
Supported by Sponsor Logo

Thanks for reading The Briefing, our nightly column where we break down the day’s news. If you like what you see, I encourage you to subscribe to our reporting here.


Greetings!

Remember back to last December, when President Donald Trump issued an executive order designed to “remove barriers to United States AI leadership”? Trump said he was revoking former President Joe Biden’s “attempt to paralyze this industry” and planned a “minimally burdensome national standard” for regulation. It’s a different story now.

Today, The Information reported that in response to a request from the Trump administration, OpenAI was releasing its latest model only to a small group of companies. The government will approve access “customer by customer” during the preview period. This follows the administration’s imposition of export controls on Anthropic’s Fable model. How exactly does either of these moves square with the phrase “minimally burdensome”? 

Whatever happened to the idea of small government and free enterprise? (Then again, this is the same administration that is talking about giving the public a stake in the AI firms.)

To be fair, the power of these new AI models deserves attention from the federal government. Someone has to make sure AI firms don’t wreak havoc with uncontrolled release of new models. But that should have been obvious when the administration threw out the old rules. 

Meanwhile, the funniest story of the day has to be the one in The New York Times, revealing that OpenAI is “leaning toward holding off” going public until next year. One reason given is that SpaceX shares have fallen since their public debut earlier this month. Now, this may not be the real reason for any delay (if there is one). But if the story is true, the AI firm needs new advisers. 

What person in their right mind imagined that SpaceX would go public at a huge valuation, and then just keep going up afterward? And yet that’s what happened: The stock rose 56% to a high of $211 in the days after the offering. Since then, it has fallen 27% from that high, to Thursday’s close of $153, but that is still well above its IPO price of $135, which means it remains a success. If OpenAI sees SpaceX’s sell-off as a bearish signal, something isn’t right in its perception of the world.

Sure, other factors in OpenAI’s decision reportedly include the choppy market—but the market has been volatile for months, thanks to the ups and downs of the Iran war. Are people at OpenAI just not paying attention to the wider world?

In case anyone needs another reason to dislike AI, add the rising cost of consumer goods. Apple today made that connection clear when it blamed its decision to raise prices for iPads, Mac computers and other products on “the rapid expansion of AI data centers,” which had led to an “extraordinary surge in demand for memory and storage.”

In its announcement, Apple didn’t specify the size of the price increases, although someone who kept a record of the old prices would be able to easily figure it out. The Wall Street Journal estimated prices rose 15% to 25%. 

Apple stock dropped 6%, suggesting investors worry that higher prices will choke off demand, which may well happen. But let’s put this into context. Firstly, Apple products were not cheap to begin with, so the price increase may not necessarily squeeze demand that much. Moreover, many rivals have already raised prices for the same reason. Samsung, for instance, jacked up prices in April, while Motorola—maker of less expensive phones—also did so around the same time. Meanwhile, Microsoft on Thursday announced price increases on the Xbox.

Everyone is blaming skyrocketing component prices. When Microsoft’s gaming chief, Asha Sharma, sent out a memo about plans to overhaul that business two weeks ago, she said that an expected holiday season price increase in storage components would mean prices had risen to more than five times what Microsoft paid for them just two years ago.

Who’s benefiting? That would be companies like Micron Technology, maker of memory components, whose business has exploded lately. It reported on Wednesday that revenue in the quarter ending May rose to $41.4 billion, compared with $9.3 billion a year earlier. Micron stock rose 15.8% on Thursday, capping an 853% rally over the past 12 months. Micron’s gain is everyone else’s loss.

• The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration on Thursday proposed eliminating a rule that requires all vehicles to have a brake pedal. The policy change would only apply to autonomous vehicles. More here.

• Bumble is exploring a sale, Reuters reported Thursday, a sign of the struggles the company has had with slowing growth and declining users over the past few years. It is working with bankers at Morgan Stanley on a potential sale, the report said, though it may not end up selling.

Check out today’s episode of TITV in which we talk about Micron, Cerebras and Qualcomm.

Start your day with Applied AI, the newsletter from The Information that uncovers how leading businesses are leveraging AI to automate tasks across the board. Subscribe now for free to get it delivered straight to your inbox twice a week.

A message from Elastic

Is your organization ready for the next wave of enterprise AI?

Enterprise leaders don’t just want better search; they need agentic AI to reason over data, automate workflows, and deliver contextual decisions. Watch our webinar to learn what’s changing, which capabilities matter, and how to plan your AI strategy for 2026.

New From Our Reporters

Exclusive

Google Revamps New AI Coding Strike Team Amid Struggle to Catch Up With Anthropic

By Erin Woo


Applied AI

Anthropic Customers Find Errant Charges, Auditing Startup Says

By Laura Bratton


Dealmaker

Citi Pitches a Cleanup for Murky SPV Market

By Yueqi Yang


Exclusive

Google Strikes Tough Negotiating Stance With Publishers on AI Licensing

By Ann Gehan


Exclusive

Trump Administration Asks OpenAI to Stagger Release of New Model Over Security Concerns

By Leo Schwartz, Stephanie Palazzolo and Amir Efrati

Upcoming Events

Wednesday, July 29 — Intimate Dinner with The Information and EY in New York City

Request an invitation to join The Information and EY for an exclusive dinner bringing together senior leaders for candid conversation on closing the trust gap in enterprise AI.

More details


Wednesday, September 23 — AI Agenda Live SF 2026

Get ahead of the story. Purchase your ticket to AI Agenda Live, where The Information's reporting team convenes the leaders driving the next era of AI. Early Access pricing available now.