policy
Scientists rebuke proposed changes to grant funding

Adobe
In late May, the White House released a sweeping proposal to overhaul how federal grants and contracts are doled out. The new rules would empower the Trump administration to override the recommendations of peer reviewers, terminate grants at will, and exercise more latitude in the type of research federal agencies support. Nearly half a million public comments were submitted on the proposal before a Monday deadline. An analysis of a portion of those comments, done by researchers at the University of North Carolina in partnership with STAT, found that 95% were in opposition to the changes.
“When you end up in a place where, with every new administration, you’re going to start all over on what the priority is, you are not going to be able to catch up with China,” said Sudip Parikh, head of a leading advocacy group. “You're not going to be able to cure disease, and you're not going to be able to grow the economy.” The administration is required to respond to substantive public comments, though it is not required to incorporate that feedback. Read more from STAT’s Anil Oza and J. Emory Parker on the overwhelming opposition to the proposal and what could happen next.
one big number
90%
That’s the percentage of infants globally who received at least one dose of the diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine last year, according to annual WHO and UNICEF estimates. Eighty-five percent completed a full three-dose series. Both numbers are a small increase from 2024 but still below 2019 levels. While fewer children received zero shots, there were more children who started the series but didn’t complete it.