Welcome to Buffering, insider news and analysis on the streaming industry.
 

SEPTEMBER 3, 2026

 

Welcome back to Buffering, where we’ve been spending our evenings doing a (belated) double binge of one of this year’s big Emmy contenders (DTF St. Louis, which aired on HBO last spring) and a show that will almost surely be a major player in the 2027 awards derby (Hulu’s Furious, which just wrapped its first season). Both are impeccably crafted and well worth a watch — unlike next week’s Republican mid-term “convention.” Our lead story this week comes from contributor Daniel Strauss, who explains why the major broadcast networks, along with cable news outlets CNN and MS Now, are not planning to give heavy play to the White House’s attempt to gin up interest in GOP candidates. Meanwhile, my colleague Chris Lee has a fascinating look behind the cult movie hit of the summer (no, it’s not Backrooms or Obsession), while Nick Quah decided to do some digging into how former Dateline correspondent Chris Hansen has been dealing with the upcoming release of Primetime, the A24 movie “inspired” by Hansen’s “To Catch a Predator” segments. We’ve also got our regular Briefering section, which this week has some news about Hallmark+. As always, thanks for reading, and hope you have a relaxing Labor Day weekend.

— Joe Adalian, West Coast editor

Subscribe now to get unlimited access to everything New York, including subscriber-only newsletters, exclusive perks, the New York app, and more.

Subscribe Now
 

In this edition: David Ellison, Rob Bonta, Mark Ruffalo, George Clooney, Tom Cruise, , Curry Barker, Leonora Ann Darby, James Harris, Mark Lane, Jane Schoenbrun, Hannah Einbinder, Gillian Anderson, Danny Boyle, Rupert Murdoch, Matt Goldman, and that thing going down in Dallas…

 

BRIEFERING

➽ Hallmark+ Is Getting a Heftier Holiday Slate This Year — And a Price Hike

’Tis (almost) the season for Hallmark Christmas movies: Within the next few weeks, if history is any guide, the cable channel will unveil its annual roster of holiday films. But getting your fix of Yuletide cheer is soon going to cost a little bit more, at least if you watch via streaming. According to a notice that recently popped up on the website's FAQ page, the monthly fee for Hallmark+ will go up $1, to $9 per month, on September 16. A Hallmark rep confirmed the upcoming price adjustment, noting that it’s the first such increase since the service launched two years ago, and added that the cost of an annual subscription will remain $80, which works out to a bit less than $6.75 per month. Plus, after (slightly) slimming down its slate of original Christmas movies last year to 24 films, the rep says Hallmark is planning to debut 34 new holiday titles  this year, “not including specials or series.” We’re gonna need a bigger hot cocoa mug. —Joe Adalian

➽ The Obsession Profit-Sharing Lawsuit

Obsession executive producer Leonora Ann Darby is suing her fellow producers, Tea Shop Productions co-founders James Harris and Mark Lane, for failing to acknowledge her key contributions to the film’s success and for not fairly compensating her once the film became a box-office hit. The film grossed $505.7 million globally. Darby claims they promised her a third of the film’s profits for helping plan key reshoots and ensuring director Curry Barker was the film’s final editor. The suit also alleges she was instrumental in making plot changes that led to the film’s success. —Alejandra Gularte (Read the full story.)

➽ This Week in Para Bros. Quotes

Our semi-recurring digest of the David Ellison–Rob Bonta standoff:

“The virulence and falseness of the slanders they direct towards their critics is evidence of the increasing weakness of their position…” —Jewish creatives’ open letter in support of Mark Ruffalo

“I don’t see how the merger financially ends up making sense.” —George Clooney

“I think it’s awesome.” —Tom Cruise

 

ADVERTISER CONTENT

 
Learn more about OpenWeb
 
 

THE BIG STORY

A Republican Midterm Convention? News Networks Shrug. “Those who want the convention can find it on C-SPAN or whatever.”

By Daniel Strauss

Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images

The Trump administration is hoping their upcoming and unprecedented midterm election convention in Dallas will play out just like your typical presidential nominating convention: a celebrity-packed and raucous building, lawmakers at every level of government frothing to get as close to the headliners as possible, and wall-to-wall coverage by all the major news networks resulting in tens of millions of eyeballs.

But judging by the lead-up to the event, that’s not what’s going to happen. Realistically, the Dallas convention is unlikely to get the same level of national attention a presidential-year convention would, according to the major news networks Vulture spoke with this week. For Donald Trump and his Republican loyalists, the goal was to produce a glitzy, splashy must-watch show serving the GOP’s most alluring arguments and figures to a wide audience. Instead the indicators are that the news networks — the venues that Trump obsesses over and are essential for any major political event to break through — will treat this more like a normal Trump rally. 

And they have good reason to. For weeks lawmakers have complained about exorbitant fees for the privilege of attending their own party’s event — with some VIP tickets costing as much as $250,000 and lawmakers having to cough up $25,000 to attend. The Wall Street Journal reported that a picture with President Trump will go for $88,000 a pop. And there has been a bevy of reporting about how burdensome and expensive attending a convention in Dallas a few months before an ominous election will be for those same elected GOP officials expected to show up. All of this casts doubt on whether the event will pull the kind of star power that entices TV networks to break their regular primetime programming and compel viewers to skip an NFL game to tune in.

It’s hard to compare the Dallas convention to a typical presidential nominating convention because those are usually four nights and have generally enjoyed a collective average of around 20 million viewers across networks — and even bigger numbers when the nominees themselves speak. This two-day midterm convention will almost certainly not pull that kind of interest at any point, even if all the networks were to cover it live. 

As a result, the event is likely to be ignored by most of broadcast television, according to the major news networks Vulture spoke with this week. Not every broadcast and cable network confirmed their final plans on the record, but the ones that did respond largely signaled plans to only focus on just the major speeches. The rest of the convention would be televised only if something newsy or interesting happens, and most likely after the fact.

CBS News, for example, is among the major networks that will not be breaking its usual programming next week. The news organization, now under Bari Weiss’s editorial control, will “cover it like we cover a typical Trump/Vance speech,” a source with knowledge of the network’s plans tells Vulture. Its news division will “report on it, certainly,” but it won’t be the kind of all-hands-on-deck situation you’d expect during a presidential-year convention.

Other networks signaled that they are either still figuring out how to handle the event but would inject a healthy dose of coverage depending on how everything unfolds. ABC says they “are still finalizing plans,” and NBC News is staying mum for now. According to multiple network employees at both CNN and MS NOW, those networks' plan is to treat the convention for what it actually is — a really long Trump rally. That means sending reporters and having a correspondent on the ground for live shots. That also means covering the major headliner speeches — Donald Trump and JD Vance — live for at least a little while. Fox News did not immediately respond to inquiries, but it’s not hard to imagine even that network — yes, the one founded by Rupert Murdoch — maintaining most of its usual programming mixed with live break-ins rather than continuously streaming the goings-on in Dallas.

“We’re sending folks like we always do to this sort of stuff,” a news director for one of the major networks tells Vulture, “not because we think this will be news, but because we want to be prepared on the off-chance there’s something interesting. And our people are good enough to figure out how to use an event like this as a sourcing opportunity.”

Of course, you can expect the most conservative of the cable news channels will break from the pack. NewsNation has specialized coverage planned, starting with a “two-hour primetime broadcast both nights” featuring its chief Washington anchor Leland Vittert. On both nights, NewsNation will start its coverage with a “special edition of Cuomo at 8 p.m. ET.”. 

One America News Network is getting in on the action as well. OANN spokesperson Charles Herring  tells Vulture they will have multiple reporters on sight [sic], including our Chief White House Correspondent, Daniel Baldwin,” adding: “We anticipate bringing our viewers extensive coverage.” Asked if that meant coverage of all the event’s speeches or just the major ones, Herring said over email “Our news director will be making the call based on breaking news and other factors. All key speeches are likely to be fully covered with OANN dipping in and out of other program events.”

A spokesperson for Newsmax did not respond to our questions, but the conservative network has a history of extensively covering Trump speeches in the same way a sports network would cover a championship game. And its audience all but expects it: The network has boasted soaring viewership whenever Trump speaks. It would be more surprising if Newsmax didn’t cover the GOP convention exactly in the way Trump expects it to. 

The wide range of coverage plans between news organizations points to the glaring issue with Trump’s big event: The “convention” conceit is misleading at best. Traditionally, a political convention happens every four years so a party can nominate their presidential candidate, even if it’s a mostly symbolic gesture for a person who has already won their primaries. All that hoopla results in a heavy lift for news networks, and involves haggling over the real estate for anchor booths and transmission facilities. There’s also a process for figuring out which network is responsible for providing the overall feed that all the other news outlets pull from. And then there’s the logistics of turning a big arena into something that can house both a lot of people, a lot of networks, and all the equipment and machinery that the crew and camera operators need.

All of that bureaucracy and labor isn’t quite happening for Dallas. The news bigwigs are thinking of it less like a party convention and more like a multi-day celebration of all things Trump. 

“Donald Trump may want to call it a convention, but it isn’t a convention,” a former top broadcast official who has handled past convention planning, told me. “There are no delegates. There’s no platform. There are no candidates being nominated. It’s a rally.”

The executive added, “It’s conceivable to me that some of the right-leaning networks — Newsmax, Fox, One America — will set up an anchor position to be there, but I suspect the others are going to treat it like a Trump-a-Palooza.”

Another veteran executive of multiple newsrooms pointed at what networks would have to sacrifice to cover the event fully. “If you’re a broadcast network, your audience is going to be pretty irritated,” the executive told me, ticking off what the GOP shindig will be competing with: primetime sporting events and popular fall programming. Especially if there’s a big sporting event — for instance, the first night of the convention coincides with the NFL season opener, a Super Bowl rematch between the Seattle Seahawks and the New England Patriots. That will almost certainly be of more interest to the majority of viewers. “Those who want the convention,” the executive says, “can find it on C-SPAN and cable and whatever.”

And then there’s another question looming for the Republican lawmakers, donors, and rank-and-file: Do they want this to air live on national television? Going into the midterms, Donald Trump’s approval numbers are deeply underwater. A candidate would be forgiven for not wanting to associate too closely with a pseudo Trump rally, and indeed, a fair share of Republicans have come up with excuses not to go. 

In more normal times, there might be one other rub to this convention. Since the convention is an obviously political event featuring political candidates, networks that cover it would probably have to provide equal time to the opposing candidate to follow the Federal Communications Commission’s equal time rule. Usually that’s taken care of by airing both party conventions — but Democrats aren’t holding any such midterm equivalent. 

But yet another type of danger lurks for networks not covering Trump’s convention, says  former FCC commissioner Tom Wheeler: the President himself.

“My guess is that Trump wants this covered and that [FCC Chairman Brendan] Carr will go along, including haranguing the networks if they don't provide gavel-to-gavel,” Wheeler said in an email.

It’s easy to picture the convention getting overall viewership numbers well below what ratings-obsessed Trump would like, triggering the president to rage against the networks for being biased or unfair. As Wheeler points out: "Take a look at how Trump has kept ABC's The View from hosting political candidates."

 

LITTLE DEATH

How Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma Became the Cult Film of the Year Fans are turning up to screenings in costumes and fake blood, while the ecstatically reviewed film is quietly creeping up the box-office leader board.

By Chris Lee

Photo: John Phillips/Getty Images for G Spot/MUBI/Picturehousr

Move over Gentleminions. Glinda and Elphaba multiplex cosplayers, please sit down. And all you Chicken Jockey popcorn-throwing troublemakers — your impact on moviedom has been swept from the theater. Meet this summer’s preeminent movie fans: the Miasmamaxxers.

Fans of writer-director Jane Schoenbrun’s ecstatically reviewed, idea-rich slasher flick meta-narrative deconstruction Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma have been turning up to screenings across North America drenched in fake blood, attired in homemade “Welcome to Camp Miasma” T-shirts, and decked out as its villain, Little Death, the mute, spear-wielding serial killer with a ceiling vent for a head. Further, since the $10 million, Mubi-distributed art-house/grind-house romantic mash-up platformed into around 1,000 theaters over the August 22 weekend, so-called “Janeheads” — super-enthusiasts of Schoenbrun, whom Vulture critic Alison Willmore calls “the most prominent trans filmmaker working right now” — have taken to social media en masse to show off their Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma nail art, hairstyles, cosplay, branded merch, and even tattoos (yes, the permanent kind). They repeatedly attend showings of the movie (in ever larger groups), effectively willing Camp Miasma into existence as 2026’s first cult film.

According to Mubi’s head of theatrical marketing, Matt Goldman, that reaction is especially fitting considering Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma’s movie-within-a-movie subplot. It follows Hannah Einbinder’s aspiring horror-movie auteur character as she tries to persuade Gillian Anderson’s ingenue turned recluse (the star of a long-running ’80s slasher-movie series) to reprise her role in a studio reboot; sexual awakening and crescendos of arterial splatter ensue. “When you look at the DNA of the movie — the revival of a cult franchise, what happens when a filmmaker goes to meet the final girl from that franchise — it makes a certain amount of sense that the relationship between film and audience would mirror what is happening to the character in the movie,” Goldman says. “There are people dressing up as camp counselors. They are reenacting the camp-scene flashback moment from the film. You have people dressing up as Little Death. So when we say in the tagline in the trailer, ‘Little Death is coming,’ it is literally coming — there are people who are ready for its arrival….”