glp-1 drugs
Altimmune to study obesity drug in alcohol use disorder, following Eli Lilly
From STAT's Elaine Chen: Biotech company Altimmune announced in an investor call yesterday that it will study its obesity drug, which targets receptors of the GLP-1 and glucagon hormones, in alcohol use disorder, as mounting evidence supports the potential of GLP-1 drugs to help with addiction.
Altimmune executives think that their molecule, called pemvidutide, could be particularly helpful for liver conditions, since there are glucagon receptors located in the liver. The company has already been studying the drug in weight loss and in the liver disease MASH, and are now expanding into alcohol-related conditions.
The company plans to start a study in alcohol use disorder in the second quarter of this year, and another study in alcohol-related liver disease in the third quarter.
Eli Lilly has also started studying mazdutide, a GLP-1/glucagon drug it’s developing with Chinese biotech Innovent, in alcohol use disorder. Lilly CEO Dave Ricks has said the company also plans to test obesity drugs in other areas of addiction, like nicotine and drug use disorders.
Novo Nordisk is running a study of its obesity drugs in alcohol-related liver disease, but has not yet started any trials in addiction.
There hasn’t been much uptake of current treatments for alcohol use disorders, but Altimunne executives attribute that to the fact that the drugs aren’t very effective and are difficult to administer. They argue that once effective treatments are made available, the market will materialize, much like what happened with obesity drugs.“The drug creates the marketplace if it’s effective,” Altimmune’s chief medical officer, Scott Harris, said in an interview.
Opinion
Restrictions will weaken FDA advisory committees
The proposed “conflict-free” restrictions on FDA advisory committees will erode their efficacy, Peter J. Pitts, a former agency associate commissioner, opines for STAT. Setting such a high bar would exclude many top experts who have industry experience, in his view. Pitts argues that the existing advisory committee structure offers transparency and scientific rigor, which are now under threat.
Selectively scrutinizing conflicts of interest and limiting qualified voices in decision-making will harm regulatory decisions, he says.
“Independent-thinking advisory committee members will feel threatened and suffocated by the unspoken threat of federal investigators knocking at their clinic doors,” Pitts writes. “Such ill-considered policies amount to lettres de cachet for science deniers, posturing politicians, and the tort bar.”
Read more.