Supply Lines
The value of a nation’s currency can tell you a lot about what investors think of the government in charge and the economy it oversees. So t
View in browser
Bloomberg

Supply Lines is now exclusively for Bloomberg.com subscribers. As a loyal reader, we’ll keep sending it to you for a limited time. If you’d like to continue receiving Supply Lines, and gain unlimited digital access to all of Bloomberg.com, we invite you to subscribe now at the special rate of $129 for your first year (usually $299).

The value of a nation’s currency can tell you a lot about what investors think of the government in charge and the economy it oversees. So the US dollar’s slump in recent weeks looks like a bad omen for President Donald Trump and the American economy.

But there’s another reason a weakening dollar isn’t great for Trump and his team: The world’s reserve currency is doing the opposite of what economics tells you it should when the US raises tariffs sharply.

Yes, that’s a sign markets are worried about what tariffs will do to US growth. It’s also, though, undermining the argument officials like Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent are making on who really bears the economic burden of tariffs.

Read More: Bessent Says Recent Decline in Dollar Is a Natural ‘Adjustment’

The argument Bessent and others on Trump’s economic team offer is that the stronger dollar you would expect to come with tariffs means other countries’ weaker denominations leave their people with diminished purchasing power.

That’s what economics tells you should happen. Though Bessent goes a step further and argues that, thanks to their weaker currencies, other countries pay the real price of tariffs. Yet most economists will tell you that US importers pay the actual tariff bill collected by Customs and often choose to pass the cost on to American consumers.

Slumping Confidence

There are plenty of signs the US public isn’t buying the Bessent argument, which is central to the idea Trump is selling that tariffs and the revenues they raise amount to a shifting of the US tax burden to offshore villains. Take a look at consumer sentiment gauges and recent polls.

  • On this edition of Bloomberg’s Trumponomics podcast, we try to understand White House economist Stephen Miran’s worldview and what it could mean for currencies and the global economic order

That isn’t stopping administration officials from making their case as they prepare for the rollout of Trump’s biggest tariffs yet on April 2, which Bessent on Sunday said “is going to be a big day.”

“China’s manufacturers,” Bessent told NBC’s Meet the Press, will “eat the tariffs. I believe that the currency adjusts.”

But what if the currency isn’t adjusting as expected? Since Trump took office the US has increased tariffs on all Chinese goods by 20%.

Read More: UBS’ Weaker Dollar 2025 Forecast Resembles Pre-Election Outlook

The rub is, of course, that China’s renminbi does not float freely. According to Bloomberg data, even if you go back to November and Trump’s victory, the heavily managed Chinese currency is only down 1.5%. Which means by Bessent’s definition Chinese manufacturers aren’t really eating the cost.

True, free-floating currencies like the Canadian dollar and Mexican peso have weakened more. But even those currencies are down far less than the 25% headline tariffs they’ve been hit with would imply, even if you take into account the 30-day reprieve some imports have received.

Tariff ‘Angst’

More broadly the dollar has been slumping. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index, which tracks the currency’s value against 10 major currencies, is down 1.7% in the past month. Against the Swedish krone the dollar is down more than 5%.

ING head of Americas research Padhraic Garvey last week pointed to the slumping dollar as one signal of what he labeled “deep tariff angst.”

Read More: Wall Street Battered Again by Trump Chaos as New Winners Emerge

As Garvey wrote in his March 11 note to clients, earlier this year expectations of a 10% hike in US tariffs led to an equivalent rise in the dollar. “However, with 25%-50% tariffs we are in a very different situation and with the dollar now in fact falling against most currencies the mathematics simply don’t work,” Garvey wrote.

American manufacturers have long complained about the impact of what they see as an overvalued dollar that makes US exports more expensive overseas. Trump has also at times called for a softer dollar to help manufacturing.

Financial Accord

That history has led to a conspiracy theory that Trump and his team are deliberately trying to weaken the dollar based on incoming economic adviser Stephen Miran’s published idea of a Mar-a-Lago Accord to do just that.

But the broader suspicion of investors appears to be simply that Trump has miscalculated the cost of his import taxes. Which doesn’t bode well for April 2 as Trump introduces what he has branded “reciprocal” tariffs.

Read More: Powell Faces Balancing Act Between Markets and Wait-and-See Mode

The idea, as Bessent repeated Sunday, is to match with a single US duty trade barriers including tariffs, taxes and local regulations that US companies face overseas.

Given Trump and his advisers have identified value-added taxes other countries collect as one target, it’s fair to expect a 20-25% number or higher. So will the dollar appreciate in response as Bessent expects?

Maybe not, based on the recent evidence. Right now investors don’t seem to believe Bessent and his arguments on who will bear the real cost of tariffs. Instead, they see a slowing US economy bearing the burden of tariffs.

Shawn Donnan in Washington

Click here for more of Bloomberg.com’s most-read stories about trade, supply chains and shipping.

Charted Territory

Port politics | Chinese authorities increased pressure on CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd. over its plan to sell its Panama ports stake by sharing a second newspaper commentary attacking the deal. The commentary questioned whether the deal was harming China and aiding evil, and called on companies to be careful about which “side they should stand on.” The transaction is set to generate cash proceeds of more than $19 billion, but the recent attacks have stoked concern that China might somehow try to intervene.

Today’s Must Reads

  • The Federal Maritime Commission is investigating global maritime chokepoints to assess whether a country, ocean carrier or other operator are creating conditions unfavorable for US shipping and foreign trade.
  • US military strikes on the Yemen-based Houthi militants will be “unrelenting” until the group stops shooting at civilian and military vessels in the Red Sea, the Pentagon chief said.
  • Senior members of the European Union’s executive arm and US officials spoke on Friday to explore ways to move forward after Trump’s metals tariffs prompted a trade war.
  • Canada’s new Prime Minister Mark Carney ordered a review of the country’s contract with the US’s Lockheed Martin Corp for F-35 fighter jets, a new front in the dispute between the two sides. Meanwhile, the early salvos in a North American trade war have been a boon to the operator of Canada’s largest derivatives exchange.
  • Senior South Korean and US officials met in Washington to address trade issues including tariff measures, with both sides agreeing to continue dialogue. Separately, Thailand’s steelmakers are asking their government for more protection a Trump’s import tariffs stir global fears about a glut of metal looking for other markets.
  • An anxious sense of wait-and-see may emerge from central banks this week, in their first collective assessment of how Trump’s trade policies are roiling the world economy.

On the Bloomberg Terminal

  • Trump’s plan to hit Europe with tariffs is partly motivated by differences in sales tax rates, which his administration views as an export subsidy. Is it a legitimate concern? Maybe. Is it all that matters for competitiveness? No, says Bloomberg Economics, because other taxes and policies are crucial for how businesses compete internationally. 
  • The OECD’s Pillars 1 and 2 project is reaching its apotheosis, with the aim of eliminating tax havens and steering revenue to market-based countries away from manufacturing-based nations. With Trump in the White House, the global corporate wealth tax — Pillar 1 — might be dead on arrival, says Bloomberg Intelligence.
  • To see a Bloomberg Economics trade tool: BECO MODELS TRADE <GO>
  • Run SPLC after an equity ticker on Bloomberg to show critical data about a company's suppliers, customers and peers.
  • Use the AHOY function to track global commodities trade flows.
  • See DSET CHOKE for a dataset to monitor shipping chokepoints. 
  • For freight dashboards, see BI RAIL, BI TRCK and BI SHIP and BI 3PLS
  • Click HERE for automated stories about supply chains.
  • On the Bloomberg Terminal, type NH FWV for FreightWaves content.
  • See BNEF for BloombergNEF’s analysis of clean energy, advanced transport, digital industry, innovative materials, and commodities.

Like Supply Lines?

Don’t keep it to yourself. Colleagues and friends can sign up here. We also publish the New Economy Daily, a briefing on the latest in global economics.

For even more: Follow @economics on Twitter and subscribe to Bloomberg.com for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and gain expert analysis from exclusive subscriber-only newsletters.

How are we doing? We want to hear what you think about this newsletter. Let our trade tsar know.

Follow Us

Like getting this newsletter? Subscribe to Bloomberg.com for unlimited access to trusted, data-driven journalism and subscriber-only insights.

Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal. Find out more about how the Terminal delivers information and analysis that financial professionals can’t find anywhere else. Learn more.

Want to sponsor this newsletter? Get in touch here.

You received this message because you are subscribed to Bloomberg's Supply Lines newsletter. If a friend forwarded you this message, sign up here to get it in your inbox.
Unsubscribe
Bloomberg.com
Contact Us
Bloomberg L.P.
731 Lexington Avenue,
New York, NY 10022
Ads Powered By Liveintent Ad Choices