Support independent journalism
|
|
|
|
|
|
}}} |
|
|
|
Jun 18, 2025
Somebody call Pamela Anderson
Donald Trump’s parade was a disappointment, but the nationwide demonstrations against him weren’t
|
|
|
Adam Gabbatt |
 |
|
|
For his 59th birthday, Donald Trump went big. He held a party at the Trump Taj Mahal casino in Atlantic City – it would go bust 11 years later – with a 15ft cake. He even paid Pamela Anderson to attend.
Twenty years on, the now president wanted to go even bigger. Trump had wanted a military parade for a long time, and he finally got one, a celebration of 250 years of the US army that just happened to fall on his 79th birthday. But when the parade finally came, it just wasn’t quite all that.
The weather in Washington on Saturday was awful. Despite the White House’s claims that 250,000 people attended, there were large gaps in the crowds – “attendance appeared to fall far short” of predictions, the Associated Press reported – while some of the tanks, supposedly a show of military might, squeaked loudly as they drove down the National Mall, prompting widespread mockery on late-night TV shows.
|
|
Corporate sponsorship gave the whole thing a cheap air. An announcer declared: “Special thanks to our sponsor, Coinbase,” as one group of fatigue-clad military members walked past. A giant screen hoisted above the Mall showed black-and-white images of soldiers during the Gulf war and the “global war on terror”, a solemn remembrance only interrupted by the announcer thanking Ultimate Fighting Championship for its sponsorship. ScottsMiracle-Gro, a lawn seed company, was another to receive a shoutout.
Marco Rubio, Trump’s secretary of state, was filmed yawning less than 30 minutes into the three-hour affair. Even Trump appeared to fall asleep during the end of the ceremony.
“Just kind of lame,” one attendee told my colleague J Oliver Conroy.
The edge was further taken off Trump’s parade by the larger public response. Multiple polls found that most Americans thought the parade, which cost up to $45m, was not a good use of public money.
And the real star of the weekend, of course, was the mass demonstrations against Trump held in cities across the US. The “No Kings” protests were attended by millions and dominated news coverage, drawing attention, which Trump likes, away from the president.
“They’ve defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights, and slashed our services. The corruption has gone too far. No thrones. No crowns. No kings,” read the blurb for the demonstrations, which riffed on Trump’s comparison of himself to a monarch earlier this year.
The signs that people were carrying, many of which were gleefully shared across social media and on mainstream news, were not kind. The Guardian’s Melissa Hellmann attended the Philadelphia protest and reported:
“Victor, a 56-year-old chef originally from Argentina, held a hand-painted sign that depicted Trump as a pig, with ‘Oink’ painted atop his image in large letters. ‘Other people have the right to work hard and make a life for themselves when they come from a country where they can’t do that or are facing political oppression or are desperate,’ he said. ‘This is supposed to be the land of opportunity and a land built on immigrants.’”
In Texas, one man carried a sign with the message “Dump Trump” above an unflattering photo, captured from the rear, of Trump playing tennis.
|
|
There was no mass demonstration in Washington, but about 60 people were arrested at a protest near the parade. In a fitting symbol of our times, one of those arrested was an 87-year-old military veteran who was using a walker.
“It feels like a betrayal,” John Spitzberg, an air force veteran who lives in a retirement home, told ABC, “of the Americans and other people who served this country for the purpose of keeping democracy, freedom.”
Trump wanted a parade for his birthday party. Instead he got a nationwide demonstration that his lurch towards authoritarianism will not go unchallenged. Maybe he should have just stuck with the giant cake.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What terrible truth were they trying to expose?
|
|
Our new six-part investigative podcast series uncovers what happened to a journalist and an indigenous defender after disappearing in the Amazon.
|
|
|
New episodes every Monday.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Betsy Reed
|
Editor, Guardian US
|
|
|
|
|
I hope you appreciated this newsletter. Before you move on, I wanted to ask whether you could support the Guardian’s journalism as we face the unprecedented challenges of covering the second Trump administration.
As Trump himself observed: “The first term, everybody was fighting me. In this term, everybody wants to be my friend.”
He’s not entirely wrong. All around us, media organizations have begun to capitulate. First, two news outlets pulled election endorsements at the behest of their billionaire owners. Next, prominent reporters bent the knee at Mar-a-Lago. And then a major network – ABC News – rolled over in response to Trump’s legal challenges and agreed to a $16m million settlement in his favor.
The Guardian is clear: we have no interest in being Donald Trump’s – or any politician’s – friend. Our allegiance as independent journalists is not to those in power but to the public.
How are we able to stand firm in the face of intimidation and threats? As journalists say: follow the money. The Guardian has neither a self-interested billionaire owner nor profit-seeking corporate henchmen pressuring us to appease the rich and powerful. We are funded by our readers and owned by the Scott Trust – whose only financial obligation is to preserve our journalistic mission in perpetuity.
With the new administration boasting about its desire to punish journalists, and Trump and his allies already pursuing lawsuits against newspapers whose stories they don’t like, it has never been more urgent, or more perilous, to pursue fair, accurate reporting. Can you support the Guardian today?
We value whatever you can spare, but a recurring contribution makes the most impact, enabling greater investment in our most crucial, fearless journalism. As our thanks to you, we can offer you some great benefits. We’ve made it very quick to set up, so we hope you’ll consider it.
|
However you choose to support us: thank you for helping protect the free press. Whatever happens in the coming months and years, you can rely on the Guardian never to bow down to power, nor back down from truth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}}} |
|