Opinion Today: No, seriously, is A.I. going to kill us all?
The existential threat of artificial intelligence isn’t science fiction.
Opinion Today
October 11, 2025
Martin Naumann

By Stephen Witt

Mr. Witt is the author of “The Thinking Machine,” a history of the A.I. giant Nvidia. He lives in Los Angeles.

When ChatGPT appeared on the scene in late 2022, I was convinced I was cooked. The artificial intelligence tool wrote as well as I did, sometimes better, and I didn’t see a place for myself in the future economy. Still, I knew that if I had any chance of surviving as a writer, I had to be an early adopter of it.

In the past three years I’ve devoted myself full-time to using, studying and learning about A.I. Earlier this year I published “The Thinking Machine,” a biography of Jensen Huang, the chief executive of Nvidia, the world’s leading maker of A.I. chips. Huang’s near monopoly on the sector has made him perhaps the most powerful man in A.I., but when I asked him about some of the potential risks of these systems, he brushed me off. When I kept asking, he grew impatient and told me that the question was a waste of his time.

I haven’t stopped asking it, though. For a guest essay in Times Opinion this week, I interviewed researchers who study how A.I. is advancing, what it’s capable of and what threat it might pose. Forget my profession; is A.I. going to kill us all? Some of these experts told me that there is no reason to fear truly catastrophic risks, like a pathogen engineered by A.I. to wipe out humanity. Others told me that they worry such risks may be around the corner. The only point of consensus was that A.I. keeps getting smarter and smarter — and it is not slowing down.

The more I learn about A.I., the harder it is to imagine the future. I do not think the day is very far away when this technology will be able to do every aspect of my job. My hope is that as A.I. becomes more powerful, human connection — the one thing computers can’t replicate — will become ever more valuable, and that I will still have a place.

That’s the optimistic scenario, anyway.

READ THE FULL ESSAY

Guest Essay

The A.I. Prompt That Could End the World

A destructive A.I., like a nuclear bomb, is now a concrete possibility; the question is whether anyone will be reckless enough to build one.

By Stephen Witt

THE WEEK IN BIG IDEAS

Editors’ Picks

Scheduling Note: Opinion Today will not publish on Monday, Oct. 13. We will return on Tuesday, Oct. 14.

We hope you’ve enjoyed this newsletter, which is made possible through subscriber support. Subscribe to The New York Times.

Games Here are today’s Mini Crossword, Wordle and Spelling Bee. If you’re in the mood to play more, find all our games here.

Forward this newsletter to friends to share ideas and perspectives that will help inform their lives. They can sign up here. Do you have feedback? Email us at opiniontoday@nytimes.com.

If you have questions about your Times account, delivery problems or other issues, visit our Help Page or contact The Times.

If you received this newsletter from someone else, subscribe here.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

You received this email because you signed up for the Opinion Today newsletter from The New York Times.

To stop receiving Opinion Today, unsubscribe. To opt out of other promotional emails from The Times, including those regarding The Athletic, manage your email settings.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebookxinstagramwhatsapp

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

LiveIntent LogoAdChoices Logo

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018