Artificial
intelligence may upend the relationship between labor, private enterprise, and American government in the years to come. Enter OpenAI, the AI giant that wants to supply ideas that could compose a new social contract akin to the New Deal.
OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, on Monday released a new policy roadmap that mixes progressive and
free-market proposals into a framework that casts the company as a responsible corporate actor—even as it faces scrutiny over its long-term finances.
In OpenAI’s vision of the future, workers own a stake in AI’s rewards should the staggering sums poured into the rapidly-growing sector pay off. Notable ideas include a public wealth fund seeded by AI firms and later invested into long-term assets. Americans would receive that money as dividends down the road, even if they weren’t shareholders in
AI.
“Unless policy keeps pace with technological change, the institutions and safety nets needed to navigate this transition could fall behind,” the company said in the 13-page policy document. “Ensuring that AI expands access, agency, and opportunity is a central challenge ... we should aim for a future where superintelligence benefits everyone.”
The concepts in the document aren’t new. Many of them have circulated in Congress and Washington policy circles for years — usually among progressive
lawmakers.
The blueprint draws from ideas long endorsed by Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, a prominent progressive. He’s strongly criticized AI development as another path for Silicon Valley executives to grow their wealth and power at the expense of the middle class. Notably, Sanders supports a pause on data center construction.
The overlap between what Sanders supports and OpenAI’s platform includes: - A four-day workweek that doesn’t slash pay or
benefits for fewer hours worked
- Higher taxes on capital gains among the richest and corporate income
- Strengthening unemployment benefits, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid
- A tax on robots and other kinds of automated labor
OpenAI founder Sam Altman emphasized that the blueprint was intended to stir debate on how to soften a disruption to the labor force that some analysts and lawmakers believe is
imminent.
“The goal here is really to start a conversation,” Altman told Axios. “That said, the receptiveness from all directions to the fact that we are going to have to try some different things and the sooner we can start talking through them, the better, has surprised me.” |