Last week, we discussed Texas' consideration of a state-mandated reading list for its public schools. Here are some of your thoughts on required reading:
Paul H. wrote: “It’s not a bad idea to mandate titles that have a universal importance or significance. The problem for me is when a particular viewpoint or set of beliefs dominate. I worked at a school where every major religion was represented. I would not have approved reading the Bible as a mandate, for example. A mandated list should be carefully curated to resonate universally.”
Elizabeth A. wrote: “It seems ironic that the state that pushes for parental rights is telling teachers they have no choice in the books they teach. When I teach a novel, I want to bring my students to the table with me. I want to open the door to a world they haven’t discovered. My passion for the book draws them in. I want my kids to love reading. That passion is fostered by texts that are varied and meaningful ... This list leaves out important voices in American literature. It looks like the list from 30 years ago when I was in high school: Dominated by white men. That world is represented in our lives already.”
Rosemary K. wrote: “I am British, went to school in London but have lived in northern Scotland for many years. All three of my own children were born up here and went to Scottish schools ... In our education system, we do have ‘set books’ which pupils have to read to be able to pass English Lit exams. I hated every set book (apart from LP Hartley’s The Go-Between) as did my children. I believe that forcing people to read certain books is guaranteed to put them off those books — and often off reading in general — for years, and sometimes for life."
That’s all for now. See you next week!
P.S., if a friend sent you this newsletter and you want to sign up, the place to do it is npr.org/newsletter/books. :) |