Last week, we asked you to share your personal experiences on either side of the labor-management divide. Here are some of your responses about unions and what the latest round of book worker-organizing might mean for readers:
Kristen H. wrote: “Even though I grew up in the ‘80s in a town that saw a lot of really devastating strikes, which made me highly ambivalent about labor relations for a long time, I remain in favor of unions. All people deserve to be fairly compensated for their labor — an employee with no protections and barely making ends meet is in an impossible position, which, of course, is a strategy some corporations rely on to keep wages low. I can only see it as a plus for publishing and readers to have well protected workers.”
Linda C. wrote: “The Big Five publishers control the reading and publishing market. So-called ‘independent bookstores’ aren’t really independent but outlets for these Big Five. Should the workers be adequately compensated? Of course. But the writers/authors should be too, beyond the boilerplate royalties.”
Beth W. wrote: “I love that people in the book businesses are organizing and advocating for the needs of themselves and the industry. Now more than ever we need to nourish the creation and distribution of words and ideas, and the foundation of that is protecting and promoting the human beings who make that happen. Cheers to them all, and I hope they get the support they deserve!”
That’s all for now. See you next week!
P.S., if a friend sent you this newsletter and you want to sign up, the place to do it is npr.org/newsletter/books. :)
|