Last week, we asked for your thoughts on how AI should be handled when work is evaluated for literary prizes. Here’s what you said:
Teresa A. wrote: “I've personally written every book I've published. But now my publisher asks me to run the manuscript through AI before submitting the final copy. I instruct AI to check for grammar, spelling, repetition, omissions, etc … Should I be disqualified from a competition because of that? I don't believe so. Would I ever submit work for publication that relied on AI? No way. What is the line? If I have an awkward sentence and AI ‘fixes’ it is that a line crossed? I don't know the answer but I can spot AI writing a mile away.”
Kate A. wrote: “For your question on what to do about the use of AI or detecting AI in books, I’m stumped. I can only suggest that if people want to avoid AI in books, they should just ensure they are reading something pre-2022, when public models like Chat GPT became available.”
Ted K. wrote: “I teach an online, asynchronous course at my local community college. I count on a handful of AI detecting software products to ferret out cheaters. It is unthinkable to teach a course like that in this age without these tools. These same services send me emails suggesting I use them to write communications to my students, which I find highly ironic. The students pretend to write, I pretend to teach – what could possibly go gnorw?”
That’s all for now. See you next week!
P.S., if a friend sent you this newsletter and you want to sign up, the place to do it is npr.org/newsletter/books. :)
|