![]() I Gave a Robot Access to My Apartment. Plus. . . Freya India on the commodification of Christianity. Why are college math professors having to review fractions? An evening with Zohran Mamdani’s rent-freeze brigade. And much more.
(Illustration by The Free Press, image via William Gottlieb/Corbis via Getty Images)
It’s Friday, June 12. This is The Front Page, your daily window into the world of The Free Press—and our take on the world at large. Today: Freya India on the apps and subscriptions commodifying Gen Z’s religious revival. Josh Code joins Zohran Mamdani’s rent-freeze canvassing brigade. A UC Berkeley math professor on why abolishing the SAT means her students can’t understand fractions. And much more. But first: Suzy Weiss on the AI robots coming soon to an apartment near you. This week, the future arrived at my doorstep in the form of two sweaty college students, wearing cameras on their heads and wielding a tube of Clorox wipes. I was getting free cleaning services through an AI training start-up called Shift, which bills itself as a gateway to an abundant new economy. In addition to two cleaners, it also sent a private chef to make me lunch. But here’s the catch: Everyone running a vacuum over my floors or cooking me branzino did so while being recorded, their physical actions batched, analyzed, and transformed into training data for the next generation of AI-powered robots that the company intends to deploy across commercial and industrial sectors—to, eventually, complete chores autonomously. I spoke with Bercan Kilic, one of the co-founders of Shift, as well as my college-kid cleaners, about the initiative. “What could happen, in 50 years, is basically all services and goods are free, or are close to free,” Kilic told me. But will turning our houses into self-imposed surveillance states spell the bright beginning of a liberated new age, or the bitter end of blue-collar work? Read my story to find out. —Suzy Weiss
America’s 250th birthday is less than a month away, and we’re celebrating it by paying tribute to the Great Americans who made this country what it is. Next up: Sandra Day O’Connor. From 1981 to 2006, O’Connor served as the Supreme Court’s enormously influential swing vote, often deciding cases split between the four liberals and four conservatives. Today, Charles Lane reflects on her extraordinary journey from a remote Arizona ranch to the highest court in the land—and how she “made herself a formidable justice the same way she had, as a girl, learned to brand calves, fire a rifle, or turn a bobcat into a house pet.” |