Top headlines
Lead story
How would you define “harm”?
Would it include destroying a panther’s habitat, reducing a butterfly’s food source or interfering with an endangered whale’s ability to communicate with its calf and the rest of its pod?
As the Trump administration chips away at the Endangered Species Act, it has redefined “harm” to mean only directly injuring or killing the animal itself, and it is arguing that the law applies only to intentionally harming the animal.
To understand what that means in practice, UMass Amherst environmental conservation scientist Timothy Randhir looks at how risks would rise for three iconic species: the Florida panther, the right whale and the monarch butterfly.
Miss us on Sundays? Get a selection of our best and most popular stories (or try our other weekly emails).