By Akshat Rathi It’s the final stretch at COP29. Early morning the Azerbaijani presidency shared draft texts that are likely to form part of the final deal. This meant instead of eating mangal salad and pita, I was like the rest of us here digesting arcane legal text for breakfast. Then came the reactions from diplomats. Summed up in one word? Anger. The most important text, on finance, presented two extreme positions as the only options. Still, there was an acknowledgement that the deal is likely to be at least $1 trillion each year, which would be a major upgrade from the current $100 billion annually. With so much on the line for all involved, it was time to get the strong opinions out in public in one go: a five-hour marathon plenary meeting saw grievances aired from more than 60 countries. Rich nations, especially, brought up reaffirming the UAE consensus of COP28 again and again. That deal saw countries commit to triple renewable energy, double energy efficiency and transition away from fossil fuels. The logic is that any finance commitment from rich countries needs to come with a promise from all nations that they will work to cut planet-warming emissions. Reasonable, right? Not so, according to Saudi Arabia’s Albara Tawfiq. “The Arab Group will not accept any text that targets specific sectors, including fossil fuels,” he said at the plenary. That sets up a fight, which will have to be resolved if there is to be a deal in Baku. Without a deal, it won't just be a failure of COP29, but also of COP28 and sets COP30 for a failure too, said Susana Muhamad, Colombia’s environment minister. “It would be a big step back,” she added. COP28 was a stocktake that showed how far off countries were from their climate goals, and they committed to transition away from fossil fuels to get back on track. COP29 is supposed to get the finance to fund those steps that make it possible for all countries to reach climate goals and adapt to the warming already caused. And COP30 is where, empowered with the funds, countries come with more ambitious climate plans. It's why the three COP presidencies created a troika. A failure at COP29 could mean what happened in Dubai remains in Dubai, and the world suffers worse climate catastrophes. |