drink and food
Time for an alcohol facts box, U.S. agency says, but U.K. scientists aren’t sure calorie labels count
SPENCER PLATT/GETTY IMAGES
Do numbers on a label work to help people make healthier choices? Two approaches:
- You’re familiar with the nutrition box for food labels. Now it’s alcohol’s turn. The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau has proposed requiring companies to disclose alcohol content and any major food allergens. Information boxes would list the alcohol content of a drink, in fluid ounces of pure alcohol per serving, as well as the familiar calories, carbohydrates, protein, and fats. What took so long? The FDA rules over food, while the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (an agency within the U.S. Treasury) rules over, well, alcohol. STAT’s Isabella Cueto tells us more.
- Calorie counts on menus for foods you order have been around since 2018, when the FDA ordered chain restaurants to display them, and in the U.K. since 2022, when regulators there introduced the same rule. The Cochrane Collaborative concludes after its hallmark systematic review that the benefits are pretty slim, possibly leading diners to choose foods with an average 1.8% fewer calories than they would without calorie labels. But it’s not nothing, STAT’s Sarah Todd learned.
first opinion
‘Change at the FDA is a constant,’ former officials say, but bedrock principles should remain
Speaking of the FDA, it’s a given that any new presidential administration will select senior officials eager to make a difference in their new agencies. For the FDA, Marty Makary will have that opportunity. Three former FDA officials — Stuart Pape, Wayne Pines, and Mitch Zeller — urge Makary and his incoming team to keep in mind principles that have earned the FDA its reputation as the leading science-based consumer protection agency in the world: relying on good science and providing a work environment that attracts and keeps the best experts.
“Change at the FDA is a constant as the agency evolves to address new products and challenges,” they write in a STAT First Opinion. “The incoming administration should view FDA staff not as enemies, but as an extraordinarily valuable resource to pursue partnerships to advance public health.”
first person
How she finally got a ticking time bomb out of her body
We have a ton of news to digest today, but make room for this First Opinion. Oceana Callum tells a haunting and horrifying story of living with breast implants after cancer treatment that were later voluntarily recalled because they were linked to another form of cancer. No surgeon would agree to remove them unless she actually developed lymphoma, a decision supported by the FDA. Insurers have to cover breast reconstruction, for its mental health and other benefits, but not implant removal.
“For many cancer survivors, potentially carcinogenic implant removal is, obviously, integral to our peace of mind,” Callum writes. “Having a ticking time bomb in one’s body is, ironically, to be imprisoned in the same situation from which many of us struggled brutally to be freed.” Read how she got out.